Nanzan University

Homestay Option: Yes
Maximum Language Credit: 1

Strong Points:

• The Dorm I was in allowed me to practice Japanese all the time, which I think was the biggest help to my learning of the language. The constant class was difficult, but necessary. (fall, 2007)
• The language instruction in general is quite good, I think. The teachers were all very approachable and willing to help. They also had a great sense of humor, which surprised me! Despite having somewhat larger class sizes, the rotation of teachers worked quite well. The homestay program was my favorite part by far. I learned more from talking with my host mom every night than I did in class, in some instances! Either way, I will always have a place to return to in Japan if I do go back in the future. (fall, 2007)
• The study abroad students come from around the world and become a close community at Nanzan. The homestay program is also popular and worthwhile. (spring, 2005)
• The language instructors were good and enthusiastic about teaching. There were lots of opportunities to interact with Japanese students and join clubs. The program sponsors several field trips and activities for the students to travel and experience Japanese culture. After classes there is ample free time to go sightseeing and such. Students from many different countries participate in the program, so you get a chance to learn about cultures outside of Japan as well. (fall, 2004)
• Strong focus on listening and speaking. Very interactive program. (fall, 2004)

Weak Points:

• The classes other than Japanese were relatively inconsequential. (fall, 2007)
• The classes outside of the language, while not as good, are still decent. It really depends on what you take but the standard teaching style of Japanese teachers did not seem to work well for me. The campus is very inconvenient if you want to use the internet to stay in contact with your family. I did not have useable internet at my homestay, so I decided to bring my computer to campus. However, Nanzan’s network blocked all useful programs, such as Skype and instant messenger, so I could not use my computer for the purpose I brought it to Japan for! (fall, 2007)
• The instruction at my language level was poor and did not focus on conversation. There is no integration between foreign and Japanese students. (spring, 2005)
• Non-language courses were very weak for the most part. Sometimes the pace of the language classes seemed a little too slow. Vocabulary retention was not emphasized enough. (fall, 2004)
• The classes other than Japanese were boring and I didn't learn much in them. (fall, 2004)