|
BACK
TO:
The
Unsound Body
FORWARD
TO:
Deviant
Women
Portrayed as Animals
Icon of Sin
Grotesque Body
Leaky Vessels
Paradox of Female Body
|

This
image is from 1779, which is later than
the Renaissance England period ; however,
it depicts the filthy body of a whore. She has
holes in her stockings and her living quarters
are very messy revealing the untidy and
unkempt lifestyle of a whore. The cat in the
window-sill looks particularly devilish, a
common perception of prostitutes during the Renaissance.
[33] |
Whores were
considered to be of such base status that they were easily compared
to animals. The portrayal of these women as animalistic suggested
an impulsivity and primitive behaviors similar to nature’s
beasts. In Thomas Dekker’s The Honest Whore, Hippolyto,
a gentleman, shames Bellafront, the Honest Whore, when he tells
her, “Oh, you’re as base as any beast that bears…”
[9].
At this point in the play, Hippolyto knows very little about Bellafront
besides her profession as a whore. Nevertheless, he is inclined
to judge her as the basest living thing due to her wicked occupation.
Hippolyto’s immediate degradation of Bellafront is characteristic
of the common perceptions of whores during the 17th century in
England. Women who sold their bodies for money were not only representative
figures in the underworld, but they also epitomized the filth
and dirt of the city of London [15].
Due to their sexual liberty, whores were commonly infected with
pox, or syphilis,
a venereal disease contracted sexually and spread across Europe
during the sixteenth century [15].
Such a shameful
reputation contributed to the low-quality life a whore led during
Renaissance England. In a conversation between Hippolyto and Bellafront
in Dekker’s The Honest Whore, Hippolyto presumed “Methinks
a toad is happier than a whore…You are the miserablest creatures
breathing…” [9].
He imagines that the life of a whore is wretched because of the
consequences of their sinful actions. They are not only disrespected,
but these women are also bearing the physical and psychological
burdens of their slavish profession. In London the Wicked
City, A thousand years of Vice in the Capital, Fergus Linnane
depicts the brutal life of a whore during early modern England.
She explains the whores that worked in brothels “couldn't
refuse a customer, however obnoxious, drunk or violent he might
be, and whatever disgusting demands he might make....they were
worn down by the long, irregular hours, the ‘need to be
constantly obliging’, the constant drinking, the psychological
strain and venereal diseases” [20].
On top of all these strains, the whoremasters would try to cheat
the whores of their money, and these women spent a great deal
of energy only to be deceived and further exploited by men. [20].
These women were held in very low regard; thus, they were equated
to animals.
In order to defend themselves and to maintain any sense of worth,
the whore was shielded herself through wit and bawdy behavior.
Consequently, prostitutes were distrustful and intimidating for
men; therefore, they were often referred to as animals, ranging
from being identified as a horse, a cat, mutton, birds, and countless
other creatures [15].
“Horse” was a common pun pronounced as “whore”
or “whores”. Also, because a horse is an animal used
for riding, the use of the word “horse” represented
a man mounting his whore to “ride” or have sex with
her [15].
Being a mysterious feline, the “cat” depicted the
devious nature of the whore. In a dialogue
between a suburb bawd, a courtesan and a pimp in 1650, Scolopendra,
the courtesan pitied the whores who were persecuted through the
increased suppression of prostitution in 1650. The courtesan,
referring to whores as “cats” bellows, “Alas,
poor women, who are suspended from that priviledge the very Cats
enjoy, who play and sport with their Tails, and yet fear no censure
for so doing”[10].
“Mutton” and various birds, including the “hen”,
the “partridge”, and the “dove” have been
used in literature to signify a whore as well.
[Next]
|
|