A Whore's Body Is the
Icon of Sin

   

 

BACK TO:

 

The Unsound Body

 

FORWARD TO:

 

Deviant Women
Portrayed as Animals

 

Icon of Sin

 

Grotesque Body

 

Leaky Vessels

 

Paradox of Female Body

 

 

 

The image above depicts a scene in the company of the worst characters of the underworld. It was common for such bawds to join together at late hours of the night to engage in orgies and drunken brawls. [28]

During early modern England, a woman was considered “pure” and chaste” prior to having sex with a man [25]. Virginity was held in high regard to the point that a virginal woman became more valuable [25]. Therefore, women who lost their “maidenhead” were less appreciated, and the whore, in particular, was the most devalued for her incontinence. The whore’s promiscuity not only made her seem cheap, but it also served as grounds to condemn her as sinful. In Thomas Dekker’s The Honest Whore, Hippolyto tells Bellafront, “You eat but to supply your blood with sin” [9]. Hippolyto criticizes Bellafront for earning money sinfully to survive only so that she could continue to practice the sin of prostitution. Hippolyto detests the whore for selling her body to make enough money to subsist, and then continue to do so. He is disgusted by her accordance for men to use her body for pleasure. Again, he enunciates to Bellafront,

“…For your body
Is like the common shore that still receives
All the town’s filth. The sin of many men
Is within you…” [9].

This image of a whore’s body depicts not only the outside perception of its filth, but also the disgust with a whore’s acquiescence to the indulgence of a male’s desire.

The intolerance of prostitution within the early modern England society is evident in "The Reign of the Whore Discovered and her Ruin Seen", a transcript portraying judgment day in April 1659 of whores in England. In this text, the Quakers of England proclaim, “…and long hath her golden Cup passed up and down the Nations, which is full of abominations of her Fornication, whereby the Nations have been *corrupted, and the inhabitants of the Earth made drunk: But now is the hour of her Judgement come, and coming; now is her skirts lifted up, and her secret parts discovered, and discovering and the Beast on whom she rode and rides, is seen, and his colour is known, and her secret Chambers of Imagery is found out, and her Sorceries and Witchcrafts are made manifest, and many people on whom she fate, and over whom she reigned, are redeemed from under her, and reigns over her in Christ the Power of God, which redeems and which preserves in the redemption…” [28].

The Quakers portray the whore as a representation of evil, luring men under her reign through the temptations of her body. The interesting part of this passage; however, is that the men who succumb to the whore’s are redeemed by God, making them seem to be the victims of the whore’s power. The whore’s sin though, is unforgivable, for she is the wicked fiend who is thought to be the sole culprit of this sin. The iniquitous portrayal of the whore in this text is similar to Robert Greene’s description of a whore in his article, “A Notable Discovery of Cozenage”. Alan Haynes comments on Greene’s depiction of whores in Sex in Elizabethan England, claiming that Greene’s prostitutes “are rapacious professionals full of tricks to cozen any male lustful enough or stupid enough to succumb to their performances” [15]. Both the Quakers and Greene agree that a whore is a despicable woman, who preys on men, enticing them to sin. The difference, however, between the Quakers, claiming to be “Ministers of God” and Greene, who seems to commend thieves of the underworld for their witty trickery, is that Greene believes a prostitute, or any other underworld inhabitant, can redeem herself of her sins, whereas the Quakers find a whore’s sins to be inexcusable. However, seventeenth-century England’s disallowance of prostitution became apparent through government reform and punishment of whores.

 

 

 

[Next]