Chris Zeiders

                        12/10/02

Final Project Evaluation

 

Group: Wi-Fi

 

Sanjay Ginde                Roddy Knight              Chris Zeiders

 

 

Quality of the Project

 

            I am very pleased with the quality of our project.  I think that we produced a quality paper that has substance and accurately presents issues concerning wireless networks.  Steps could have been taken to ensure the flow and style of the paper matched all the way through, but we deemed this secondary to presenting a substantive project. 

I am also very pleased with our 20-minute presentation.  We worked very diligently on both producing effective slides and presenting our material in an understandable way. 

 

Personal Contribution

 

            I personally contributed in the range of 30+ hours on this project.  I was responsible for the technical aspects of wireless networks and how the 802.11 standard handles these issues.  Wireless networking notwithstanding, I had no previous knowledge of networking in general, so this project was a great learning experience for me.  Through the research of this project, I achieved a greater understanding of network architecture and how the 802.11 standard works with this architecture.  Furthermore, this project has prompted me to pester my parents for a laptop for Christmas so I can enjoy the wireless network here at school.

 

Group Dynamics

 

            We actually evenly divided up the work amongst the three group members.  (This is the first group I have been in where everybody adequately contributed their share.)  All three of us took upon the leadership role at various times and were more than willing to accept feedback and to give feedback to each other.  We had multiple productive meetings and effectively collaborated together when developing the presentation slides.  We even overcame the snow/ice storm that knocked out the power of one of our group mates for a few days.