PUBLICATIONS
Ethnic
Politics in Europe: The
Power of Norms and Incentives.
2004.
Princeton,
New Jersey:
Princeton
University
Press. 2006 Paperback version.
This detailed account of ethnic minority politics explains
when and how European institutions successfully used norms and
incentives to shape domestic policy toward ethnic minorities and
why those measures sometimes failed.
Going beyond traditional analyses, Kelley examines the
pivotal engagement by the European Union, the Organization for
Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the Council for Europe
in the creation of such policies.
Following language, education, and citizenship issues during
the 1990s in Latvia, Estonia, Slovakia, and Romania, she shows
how the combination of membership conditionality and norm-based
diplomacy was surprisingly effective at overcoming even
significant domestic opposition. However, she also finds that
diplomacy alone, without the offer of membership, was
ineffective unless domestic opposition to the proposed policies
was quite limited.
"D-Minus
Elections: The Politics and Norms of International Election
Observation." (forthcoming in International
Organization)
Abstract:
As international election monitors have
grown active worldwide, their announcements have gained
influence. Sometimes, however, they endorse highly flawed
elections. Because their leverage rests largely on their
credibility, this is puzzling. Understanding the behavior of
election monitors is important because their assessments help
the international community to assess the legitimacy of
governments and because their assessments often inform the data
used by scholars to study democracy. International election
monitoring is also interesting because it is one of a few fields
shared by both intergovernmental and non-governmental
organizations and because the core mandate of election monitors
essentially is to police norms. This study uses a new dataset of
591 international election monitoring missions from a mix of
organizations to examine the role of organizational interests
and norms in explaining monitors’ assessments of elections. It
finds that monitors do consider the elections’ quality, but they
also consider the interests of their member states or donors as
well as other compelling organizational norms. Thus, even when
accounting for the nature and level of irregularities in an
election, monitors’ concerns about democracy promotion, violent
instability, and organizational politics and preferences are
associated with election endorsement. The study also reveals
differences in the behavior of various intergovernmental and
nongovernmental organizations and explains why neither can
pursue their core objectives single-mindedly.
“The Concept of International Delegation.” 2008.
Law and Contemporary
Problems,
71(1):
1-36. With Curtis Bradley.
Most nations today participate in a dense network of
international cooperation that requires them to grant authority
to international actors. At varying levels this means that the
individual state surrenders some autonomy to international
bodies or other states by authorizing them to participate in
decisionmaking processes and to take actions that affect the
state. While some international agreements involve only
commitments, in many cases they also include provisions that
delegate some authority to a body to make decisions and take
actions. The continued growth in international organizations and
various standing bodies associated with international agreements
suggests that states increasingly find international delegation
useful in addressing the challenges associated with their
growing interdependence.
"The More the Merrier?* The Effects of Having
Multiple International Election Monitoring Organizations.” 2008.
Perspectives on Politics, forthcoming.
As the pressure to invite international election monitors rose
at the end of the Cold War, states refused to grant the United
Nations a dominant role. Thus, today multiple intergovernmental,
regional and international non-governmental organizations often
monitor the same elections with equal authority. This article
examines the costs and benefits of this complex regime to
highlight some possible broader implications of regime
complexity. It argues that the availability of many different
organizations facilitates action that might otherwise have been
blocked for political reasons. Furthermore, when different
international election monitoring agencies agree, their
consensus can bolster their individual legitimacy as well as the
legitimacy of the international norms they stress, and thus
magnify their influence on domestic politics. Unfortunately the
election monitoring example also suggests that complex regimes
can engender damaging inter-organizational politics and that the
different biases, capabilities, and standards of organizations
sometime can lead organizations to outright contradict each
other or work at cross purposes.
"Assessing the complex evolution of norms: the rise of
international election monitoring.” 2008.
International Organization, 62(2): 221-55.
Given that states have long considered elections a purely
domestic matter,
the dramatic growth of international election monitoring in the
1990s was remarkable.
Why did states allow international organizations and
nongovernmental organizations
(NGOs)
to interfere and why did international election monitoring
spread so quickly? Why did election monitoring become
institutionalized in so many organizations? Perhaps most
puzzling,
why do countries invite monitors and nevertheless cheat? This
article develops a rigorous method for investigating the causal
mechanisms underlying the rise of election monitoring,
and “norm cascades” more generally.
The evolution and spread of norms,
as with many other social processes,
are complex combinations of normative,
instrumental,
and other constraints and causes of action.
The rise of election monitoring has been driven by an
interaction of instrumentalism,
emergent norms,
and fundamental power shifts in the international system.
By dissecting this larger theoretical complexity into specific
subclaims that can be empirically investigated,
this article examines the role of each of these causal factors,
their mutual tensions,
and their interactive contributions to the evolution of election
monitoring.
"Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International
Criminal Court and Bilateral Non-Surrender Agreements."
2007. American
Political Science Review, 101(3):
573-589.
What do countries do when they have committed to a treaty, but
then find that commitment
challenged? After the creation of the International Criminal
Court, the United States tried to get countries, regardless of
whether they were parties to the Court or not, to sign
agreements not to surrender Americans to the Court. Why did some
states sign and others not? Given United States power and
threats of military sanctions, some states did sign. However,
such factors tell only part of the story. When refusing to sign,
many states emphasized the moral value of the court.
Further, states with a
high domestic rule of law emphasized the importance of keeping
their commitment. This article therefore advances two classic
arguments that typically are difficult to substantiate; namely,
state preferences are indeed partly normative, and international
commitments do not just
screen states; they also constrain.
"New
Wine in Old Wineskins: Policy Learning and Adaptation in The new
European Neighborhood policy.”
Journal of Common Market Studies
Vol. 44(1),
2006, 29-55.
The EU’s newly launched European neighbourhood policy (ENP) is a
fascinating case study in organizational management theory of
how the Commission strategically adapted
enlargement policies to
expand its foreign policy domain. From the use of action plans,
regular reports and negotiations to the larger conceptualization
and use of socialization and conditionality, the development of
the policy shows significant mechanical borrowing from the
enlargement strategies. Given the lack of the membership carrot,
the question is whether
such adaptation from enlargement can promote political reforms
in the ENP countries, which are generally poor, often autocratic
and, in some cases, embroiled in domestic conflicts. This
article traces the development of the policy and assesses
prospects for human rights and democracy reforms.
“Strategic non-cooperation as soft balancing: Why Iraq was not
just about Iraq."
International Politics Vol. 42(2), 2005,
153-173.
Many commentators explain recent transatlantic rifts by pointing
to diverging norms, interests and geopolitical preferences. This
paper proceeds from the premise that not all situations of
conflict are necessarily due to underlying deadlocked
preferences. Rather, non-cooperation may be a strategic form of
soft balancing. That is, more generally, if they believe that
they are being shortchanged in terms of influence and payoffs,
weaker states may deliberately reject possible cooperation in
the short run to improve their influence vis-a-vis stronger
states in the long run. This need not be due to traditional
relative gains concern. States merely calculate that their
reputation as a weak negotiator will erode future bargaining
power and subsequently their future share of absolute gains.
Strategic non-cooperation is therefore a rational signal of
resolve. This paper develops the concept of strategic
non-cooperation as a soft balancing tool and applies it to the
Iraq case in 2002–2003.
"International
Actors on the Domestic Scene: Membership Conditionality and
Socialization by International Institutions.”
International Organization,
Vol. 58(3), 2004, 459-459.
International relations scholars increasingly debate when and
how international institutions influence domestic policy.
This examination of ethnic politics in four Baltic and East
European countries during the 1990s shows how European
institutions shaped domestic policy,
and why these institutions sometimes failed.
Comparing traditional rational choice mechanisms such as
membership conditionality with more socialization-based efforts,
I argue that conditionality motivated most behavior changes,
but that socialization-based efforts often guided them.
Furthermore,
using new case studies,
statistics,
and counterfactual
analysis,
I find that domestic opposition posed far greater obstacles to
socialization-based methods than it did to conditionality
:
when used alone,
socialization-based methods rarely changed behavior;
when they did,
the domestic opposition was usually low and the effect was only
moderate.
In contrast,
incentive-based methods such as membership conditionality were
crucial in changing policy:
As domestic opposition grew,
membership conditionality was not only increasingly necessary to
change behavior,
but it was also surprisingly effective.
"Does
Domestic Politics Limit the Influence of External Actors on
Domestic Politics?” Human Rights Review, Vol. 4(3),
April-June 2003, 34-54.
The considerable improvements in ethnic minority legislation
in East and Central Europe during the 1990s underscore two
important points: that ethnic policy analysis need to
include international dimensions beyond the homeland, and
that such outside actors can overcome considerable levels of
domestic opposition. Indeed, European organizations were
active and participants in the formulation of ethnic policy
in countries such as Latvia, Estonia, Slovakia and Romania.
This paper explores the extent to which domestic political
opposition limited the effectiveness of external efforts to
use soft persuasion and monitoring as well as harder
political conditionality. I find that domestic politics is
not an insurmountable obstacle: when confronted with
concerted international efforts, and especially with
promises of organizational membership, national policymakers
often choose to compromise, leaving the more extreme
opposition marginalized.
*
This material is based on work supported by the National
Science Foundation under Grant No. 0550111. Any
opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations
expressed in this material are those of the author and
do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
Science Foundation.
|