Monitoring
Maxwell's Improvement
Before determining what modifications to implement, I examined Maxwell's
history and disability classification. His confidential file revealed the
first signs of disability appeared in pre-school when he demonstrated particular
difficulty with consonant clusters. The information in the file implies
that this speech difficulty resulted in delayed reading and written language
skills. This difficulty is also demonstrated through his End of Grade Scores
throughout elementary school (See Table 2).
| Grade Level |
Reading Score Precentile |
Math Score Percentile |
| 3 |
11 |
44 |
| 4 |
20 |
96 |
| 5 |
66 |
96 |
| 6 |
42 |
98 |
| 7 |
74 |
99 |
| 8 |
75 |
99 |
Table 2. Maxwell Butterfield's End of Grade Test Scores
Because of the obvious discrepancy between his math scores and his reading
scores, Maxwell was tested for a learning disability in fourth grade and
identified through the results of two tests: the Woodcock Johnson Test
and the Wechshler Intelligence Scale for Children or WISC-III (See Tables
3 and 4).
| Subject Tested |
Scores in 1995 |
Scores in 1998 |
Scores in 2001 |
| Broad Reading |
95 |
100 |
97 |
| Mathematics |
134 |
132 |
138 |
| Written Language |
81 |
75 |
98 |
Table 3. Maxwell Butterfield's Woodcock Johnson Scores
| Subject Tested |
Scores in 1995 |
Scores in 1998 |
Scores in 2001 |
| Verbal |
126 |
119 |
116 |
| Performance |
129 |
111 |
125 |
| Full Scale |
130 |
116 |
135 |
Table 4. Maxwell Butterfield's WISC-III Scores
Both of these tests are used not only to compare the student to a norm
group, but also to identify whether there is a specific learning disability
present. A person can be labeled as having a specific learning disability
when a discrepancy of 15 points exists between the WISC-III and the Woodcock
Johnson test. The proctor of the two tests reported that Maxwell was unable
to hold information in short-term memory while performing some operation
or manipulation utilizing it. He also had difficulty scanning and sequencing
simple, visual information. However, what resulted in Maxwell's being diagnosed
with a specific learning disability in reading and the written language
was the fact that his Woodcock Johnson scores in reading and the written
language were not as high as his WISC-III scores. However, his consistently
high scores in mathematics allowed the proctor to identify him as academically
gifted in that subject. The proctor also observed Maxwell's behavior and
noted that Maxwell always put forth excellent effort. When the proctor
had difficulty understanding Maxwell's speech impediment and had to ask
him to repeat his answer, Maxwell always did so willingly.
As shown in Tables 3 and 4, there was little change in Maxwell's
scores from 1995 to the present. In 1998, the proctor noted that Maxwell
continued to struggle with phonological processing and decoding skills.
She reasoned that these struggles resulted in him having difficulty getting
information through reading. Additionally, he has to work hard to express
his thoughts and ideas in writing, having a plethora of errors in spelling,
punctuation, and omission of words. His troubles with language can be clearly
seen when his Woodcock Johnson Scores are compared with a norm group (See
Table 5).
| Subject Tested |
Discrepancy from Norm Group |
| Reading Comprehension |
-23 |
| Written Expression |
-41 |
| Mathematics |
+16 |
Table 5. Comparison of Maxwell Butterfield's 1998 Woodcock Johnson Scores
to Norm
After the 1998 tests, a group of special education and general
education teachers met with Maxwell's parents to form an individualized
education program. They created a list of short-term goals, which were
to be met with 85% accuracy over the next year:
Maxwell Butterfield would
-
Use a dictionary and thesaurus to aid him in appropriate word choice
-
Draw webs to organize ideas
-
Construct an outline before writing essays and papers
-
Write a draft before completing a final paper
-
Create paragraphs with topic sentences and supporting ideas
-
Edit all essays and papers before turning them in
-
Answer comprehension questions
-
Practice spelling words
The evaluation of whether the goals were met would be conducted using report
cards and grades on papers. Additionally, the group created a list of modifications
that would be used in the classroom in order to give Maxwell the proper
support:
For classroom instruction:
-
Teacher notes
-
Graphic organizers
-
Alternate assignments, which can be modified and re-graded
-
Seated near teacher
For testing situations:
-
Read aloud option
-
Extended time
-
Dictation
-
Study guide
-
Short answer (rather than long essay)
For paper/essay situations:
-
Use of a computer so that spell check can be run
In a list of long-term goals, the parents mentioned Maxwell's strong desire
to attend college and expressed their hope for Maxwell to be a productive
citizen in the community.
In 2001, a similar process to 1998 was conducted. Maxwell's Woodcock
Johnson scores were compared to a norm group again, but this time using
a percent (see Table 6).
| Subject Tested |
Maxwell Butterfield's Percent Correct |
Average Percent Correct for Norm |
| Passage Comprehension |
96% |
90% |
| Letter-Word Identification |
63% |
90% |
| Mathematics |
100% |
90% |
| Broad Written Language |
45% |
98% |
| Dictation |
75% |
90% |
Table 6. Comparison of Maxwell Butterfield's 2001 Woodcock Johnson Scores
to Norm
The proctor again mentioned Maxwell's struggles with the written language
and noted that he was creative in developing paragraphs and in organizing
papers. His creativity, however, was causing him to write complex sentences
that were difficult to discern. His short, straightforward sentences were
much easier to understand. In their discussion of short-term goals, it
was decided that the goals would remain the same since they were not reached
to 85% accuracy. In terms of his modifications, the group eliminated all
of the classroom instruction modifications and left the following:
For testing situations:
-
Read aloud option
-
Extended time
-
Dictation
For paper/essay situations:
-
Use of a computer so that spell check can be run