Mark D. Rausher
(919) 684-2295 (Voice)
Department of Biology (919) 660-7293
(FAX)
Box 90338
mrausher@duke.edu
Duke University
Durham, NC 27708-0338
Our laboratory
is involved in a number of research projects in the areas of evolutionary
biology
and ecology:
I. Molecular evolution of ecologically important phenotypes
II. The evolution of biochemical pathways
III. The evolution of plant mating systems
IV. The evolution and ecology of plant-enemy interactions
Click on a topic or scroll down to learn more about these projects.
In a second morning-glory project, we are attempting to ascertain whether
there are
“preferred”
evolutionary pathways for producing a given phenotype. Although parallelism
at
the phenotypic
level is a common phenomenon, little is known about whether parallelism
at
the phenotypic
level is accompanied by parallel genetic change at the genetic level, largely
because
little is known about possible alternative genetic and molecular routes for
producing
the same
phenotype. Because the molecular basis of flower color is well characterized,
however,
it is possible a priori to define possible molecular routes that may be
taken to
produce
white flowers. Specifically, it is well established that white flowers
can be produced
by deactivation
of any of at least four structural genes (CHS, F3H, DFR, ANS) and
two
regulatory
genes. Because evolution of white flowers has occurred repeatedly
in the genus
Ipomoea,
it is possible to ask whether these genes have been deactivated with roughly
equal
probability
in different lineages that have evolved white flowers, or whether
one or
more of these genes have been activated preferentially. Such preferential
deactivation
may be
expected if, for example, deactivation of regulatory genes has fewer deleterious
pleiotropic
effects than deactivation of structural genes, or if deactivation of downstream
structural
genes has fewer deleterious pleiotropic effects than deactivation of upstream
genes
(which
are involved in the production of flavonoids other than anthocyanins).
Our short-
term goal
is to determine whether there are “preferred” pathways to deactivation.
Our longer-term
goal is to understand how patterns of pleiotropy and gene interaction may
determine
any pattern we discover.
In a third project on Phlox, in collaboration with Donald Levin
at the University of Texas, we
are attempting to identify a gene responsible for prezygotic
isolation. Levin has shown previously
that in regions where it grows alone, P. drummondii
has pink/lavender flowers, but in regions
where it grows with P. cuspidata it has red flowers.
Levin has also shown that this difference
in flower color reduces interspecific hybridization in
the zone of sympatry. Our goal is first
to clone the gene(s) responsible for the red-lavender
color difference, then examine patterns
of variation in this gene to characterize in more detail
the evolutionary processes that have
caused reproductive character displacement in this system.
1 Zufall, R. A., and
M. D. Rausher. 2004. Genetic changes associated with floral adaptation
restrict future
evolutionary potential.
Nature 428: 847-850.
Zufall,
R. A., and M. D. Rausher. 2003. The genetic basis of a flower-color
polymorphism in the common
morning glory,
Ipomoea purpurea. Journal of Heredity 94: 442-448.
Tiffin, P., R. E.
Miller and M. D. Rausher. 1998. Control of expression patterns
of anthocyanin structural genes
by two loci in
the common morning glory. Genes and Genetic Systems 73: 105-110.
II. The evolution of biochemical pathways
1Rausher,
M. D., R. E. Miller and P. Tiffin. 1999. Patterns of evolutionary
rate variation among genes of the
anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway. Molecular Biology and Evolution
16: 266-274.
2Lu, Y.,
and M. D. Rausher. 2003. Evolutionary
rate variation in anthocyanin pathway genes. Molecular
Biology and Evolution 20: 1844-1853..
III. The evolution of plant mating systems
The evolution of mating systems has attracted the attention of evolutionary biologists both because mating systems are extremely diverse and because a species' mating system influences a great deal of its biology. One aspect of mating system evolution that is especially important in plants is the evolution of selfing vs. outcrossing. Theoretical analyses have suggested that alleles conferring increased selfing should spread through a population to fixation unless opposed by other forces. Theory also suggests that two of the most important such forces are inbreeding depression and pollen discounting and predicts that in most situations, the balance among these forces should lead to either complete inbreeding or complete outcrossing. It is thus unclear why some species exhibit mixed mating systems and variability for selfing rate.We are attempting to address this issue by examining the evolutionary processes that prevent the spread and eventual fixation of genotypes with increased selfing affecting two ecologically important traits in natural populations of the common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. One trait is flower color, as influenced by the W locus. Alleles causing the normally pigmented flowers to be white occur naturally in this species. Frequency perturbation experiments have shown that some form of balancing selection is acting on this locus1. In other experiments, we have sought to understand how this balancing selection arises. Because white flowers are visited less frequently than pigmented flowers, white-flowered plants have a higher selfing rate than plants with pigmented flowers2. Neither pollen discounting3 nor inbreeding depression4, alone or together, is of sufficient magnitude to counteract the transmission advantage associated with the white allele. At intermediate to high frequencies of the white allele, differential pollinator visitation no longer occurs and plants with white and plants with pigmented flowers have equal selfing rates. The transmission advantage is thus frequency dependent and selection actively favors an increase in the frequency of the white allele at low frequencies of that allele. Despite attempts to detect a dark-allele advantage when rare, we still do not know what maintains the dark allele at high frequencies2, 5-7. We have begun asking similar questions about a white-flower allele at another locus, the A locus8,9
A second trait affecting selfing rate in I. purpurea is anther-stigma distance (ASD). Genotypes with little separation between anthers and stigma (small ASD) have higher selfing rates than those with substantial separation. We have again found that neither pollen discounting per se nor inbreeding depression is of sufficient magnitude to prevent the fixation of small-ASD genotypes. However, male outcross success is apparently negatively frequency dependent, with small-ASD genotypes having higher male fitness when rare, and conversely for large-ASD genotypes. The magnitude of this effect is sufficient to offset the transmission advantage of small-ASD genotypes associated with increased selfing and maintain ASD at an intermediate level10. Examination of both traits thus suggests that inbreeding depression and pollen discounting are less important in maintaining variation in selfing rates than theory suggests. Instead, frequency dependence of mating system parameters (selfing rate or male outcross success), as well as pleiotropic effects (biased inheritance in pollen), seem to be more important in stabilizing a mixed mating system in I. purpurea. In future work, we hope to examine how generally these conclusions apply to species with mixed mating systems.
In a theoretical
analysis11, we
have found that evolutionary stable mixed-mating systems can be favored
when the magnitude of inbreeding depression differs for male and female components
of fitness in hermaphrodites. This result suggests that more effort
be made to quantify the effects of inbreeding depression on male components
of fitness when trying to understand the evolution of selfing rates.
1Subramaniam,
B., and M. D. Rausher. 2000.
Balancing selection on a floral polymorphism. Evolution
54:
691-695.
2Fry,
J.D. and M. D. Rausher. 1997. Selection on a
floral color polymorphism in the tall morning glory
(Ipomoea
purpurea L.): transmission success of the alleles through pollen.
Evolution 51: 66-78.
3Rausher,
M. D., D. Augustine and A. Vanderkooie. 1993. Absence of pollen
discounting in genotypes of
Ipomoea purpurea
exhibiting increased selfing. Evolution 47: 1688-1695.
4Chang,
S.-M. and M. D. Rausher. 1999. The role of inbreeding depression in
maintaining the mixed mating system
of the
common morning glory, Ipomoea purpurea. Evolution 53: 1366-1376.
5Paulsen,
S., and M. D. Rausher. 2001.
Floral color polymorphism in Ipomoea purpurea: biased
inheritance
of the
dark allele is not a general explanation
for its maintenance. Journal of Heredity 96:
491-495.
6Mojonnier,
L, and M. D. Rausher. 1997.
Selection on a floral color polymorphism in the common morning glory
(Ipomoea purpurea): The effects
of overdominance in seed size. Evolution 51:
608-614.
7Rausher,
M. D., and J. D. Fry. 1993.
Effects of a locus affecting floral pigmentation in Ipomoea
purpurea on female
fitness components. Genetics
134: 1237-1247.
8Fehr,
C.A,. and M. D. Rausher. 2004.
Effect of variation at the flower-colour A locus on mating
system parameters in Ipomoea purpurea.
Molecular Ecology 13: 1839-1847.
9Coberly,
L.C., and M. D. Rausher. 2003.
Analysis of a chalcone synthase mutant in Ipomoea purpurea
reveals a novel
function for flavonoids: amelioration
of heat stress. Molecular Ecology 12: 1113-1124.
10Chang,
S.-M. and M. D. Rausher. 1998. Evolution in mixed mating
systems: frequency-dependent selection on
anther-stigma separation in Ipomoea
purpurea. The American Naturalist 152: 671-683.
11Rausher,
M. D. and S.-M. Chang. 1999. Stabilization of mixed-mating
systems by differences in the magnitude of
inbreeding depression for male
and female fitness components. The American Naturalist 155: 242-248.
IV. The evolution and ecology of plant-enemy interactions
A second project
involves attempting to ascertain how plant genetic variation and induced
resistance influence the population dynamics of herbivorous insects.
This project is motivated by the observation that until recently, most attempts
to account for population regulation and fluctuation in insect herbivores
have focused on the role of natural enemies of the herbivores. Recently,
however, it has become recognized that host-plant characteristics affecting
host quality can influence herbivore growth rates, survival and fecundity--the
very life-history characters that determine population dynamics. Despite
this realization there have been few attempts to determine directly whether
variation in plant characters influences herbivore population dynamics.
Using soy beans (Glycine max) and Mexican bean beetles (Epilachna
verivestis) as a model system, we have recently shown that beetle populations
on different soy bean cultivars differ in expected average population size
and frequency of fluctuation, as estimated from input-output curves measured
under field conditions3. We have also shown that cultivars with inducible resistance
produce
different dynamics than constitutively
resistant cultivars4.
In a third recent project, we have examined the selective forces acting on tolerance to herbivory in morning glories5. In particular, we attempted to determine why tolerance levels are not maximal, but kept at intermediate values. By quantifying the pattern of selection acting on tolerance to herbivbory and to apical meristem damage, we found little evidence of directional or stabilizing selection. We also found very little indication that costs of tolerance or other genetic constraints act to oppose the benefits of tolerance. However, the data indicates that at levels of herbivory different from that that occurred in our study, directional selection likely would have operated, suggesting that fluctuating selection resulting from fluctuating herbivore densities may be responsible for maintaining tolerance at intermediate levels.
In a final ongoing
project, we are attempting to determine the nature of coevolution.
Two different types of coevolution
have been proposed: pairwise and
diffuse6. In pairwise coevolution, the trajectory
of coevolution between a plant and one
of its natural enemies is independent
of the presence or absence of other natural enemies. By contrast,
in diffuse
coevolution, that evolutionary trajectory
is influenced by whether other natural enemies are present or not. We
have
developed statistical techniques
for distinguishing between these two kinds of coevolution7. We have also recently demonstrated
that the pattern of selection on
resistance and tolerance to deer herbivory in morning glories is influenced
by the presence/absence
of natural enemies, and is thus
consistent with the type of selection expected under diffuse coevolution8.
1Mauricio, R.
and M. D. Rausher. 1997. Experimental manipulation of putative
selective agents provides evidence
for the
role of natural enemies in the evolution of plant defenses.Evolution 51: 1435-1444.
2Rausher,
M. D. 1996. Genetic analysis of coevolution between plants
and their natural enemies. Trends
in Genetics
12: 212-217.
3Underwood,
N. and M. D. Rausher. 2000. The effects of host-plant quality
and plant genotype on herbivore
populationdynamics
in a model system. Ecology 81: 1565-1576.
4Underwood, N.,
and M. D. Rausher. 2002. Comparing the consequences of induced
and constitutive plant resistance for
herbivore population dynamics. The American Naturalist (in press).
5Tiffin,
P and M. D. Rausher. 1999. Genetic constraints and selection acting
on tolerance to herbivory in the common
morning
glory. The American Naturalist 154: 700-716.
6Rausher,
M. D. 1996. Genetic analysis of coevolution between plants
and their natural enemies.
Trends
in Genetics 12: 212-217.
7Iwao,
K. and M. D. Rausher. 1997. Evolution of plant resistance
to multiple herbivores:
quantifying
diffuse coevolution. American Naturalist 149: 316-355.
8Stinchcombe,
J. R., and M. D. Rausher. 2001. Diffuse selection on resistance
to deer herbivory
in the
ivyleaf morning glory, Ipomoea hederacea. The American Naturalist 158:
376-388.