triangle.com logo: classified advertising: what's happening: community: newsobserver.com
jobs: cars: real estate: dining: movies: shopping: weddings: the scene: news: business: sports:
newsobserver.com, Raleigh, NC Site Updated:  8:44 AM | SATURDAY, AUGUST 24, 2002 
SEARCH ARCHIVES:  
Home News Business Sports Features Help
newspaper_services
Full Text Archives
Letters to the Editor
Subscribe to The N&O
Place a Display Ad
Place a Classified Ad
Contact The N&O
About The N&O









Criminal records instantly online

 Weddings
  make your announcement
  email a friend
 Travel
  Travel Directory
  FREE Travel Brochures
 Personals
  people2people
 Prize Center
 

 Jobs:
  Post your resume
 > Search 1658 jobs
  Jobs at The N&O

Cars:
Find a car

Real Estate:
Commercial Properties
Apartments


 
editorial
movies
obituaries
traffic
Leaders scramble as job losses mount

Remedy misses mark

No end in sight to N.C. job losses

 
 

Monday, August 19, 2002 3:16AM EDT

Survivors are nimble; shoppers are winners



MORE ON THIS TOPIC
THE SERIES:

Part 1: Globalization of trade creates a lost generation of Tar Heel workers.

Photo gallery: No end in sight to N.C. job losses

Part 2: Retraining programs fall short.

Part 3: Political and business leaders awaken slowly to workers' pain.


LINKS:

Academic Consortium of International Trade presents views of international economists and lawyers. The site also links to sites that support, oppose or analyze trade.

For information about trade adjustment assistance and to learn which companies are certified for benefits, visit the U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration

For information about unemployment rates and North Carolina employment services, visit the Employment Security Commision of North Carolina.

Advocacy groups:
Trade Watch by Public Citizen, opposes free trade agreements.

Heritage Foundation supports free trade agreements.

Economic Policy Institute has research papers about free trade's effect on U.S. workers.

Office of the United States Trade Representative Explains why trade benefits the U.S.

RELATED STORIES
Remedy misses mark

STORY TOOLS
printer friendly version
send this story to a friend
SITE TOOLS
subscribe to our e-mail lists
get news, weather, movies on your PDA

By JOSEPH NEFF, Staff Writer

It's easy to identify the casualties of free trade in North Carolina. But who's winning? Who has benefited, so far, from a global economy?

Anyone who wears clothes, for one.

The price of men's clothing in the United States has dropped 8 percent since 1997, as the average price of all goods and services rose 11 percent.

The Research Triangle is another winner, with its concentration of pharmaceuticals and high tech. Trade agreements provide patent protection for drug, software and other knowledge-based products, to the benefit of such companies as GlaxoSmithKline and SAS Institute, which derives 50 percent of its revenue from overseas.

Some traditional companies in North Carolina have also adapted, although it has meant changing drastically.

Agile garment companies that can deliver products within weeks of an order will have a leg up on producers in Asia or Central America, where orders may take months to arrive. As will specialized factories, such as the Brooks Brothers plant in Clinton that sews fitted shirts for customers who have had their bodies digitally mapped in three dimensions at the company's flagship store on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan.

One of the most agile companies is VF Corp. of Greensboro, the country's biggest maker of jeans (Lee, Wrangler, Rustler, Brittania and others) and a big supplier of intimate apparel, swimsuits and outdoor wear.

"VF is in a class all its own," said Kay Norwood, a longtime textile and apparel analyst. "It stands apart for its brand management and technology."

To survive in a world where the clothing prices are dropping and the competition -- in style, variety and price --is fierce, VF has turned to savvy marketing, advertising and a strategy it calls "retail-floor management." VF employs massive databases and clever software to track sales and stock product on a store-by-store basis, whether it's J.C. Penney or Wal-Mart or Dillard's.

"When consumers walk in the door, the product they want is waiting for them," said Cindy Knoebel, VF vice president for finance and public relations.

But smart technology goes only so far in the apparel business.

"At the end of the day, the largest component to making apparel is labor," Knoebel said.

VF has closed or plans to close 21 high-cost North American factories in 2001 and 2002 and continues to shift production to lower-cost factories in Mexico, the Caribbean and Asia. At least 2,500 VF workers have lost their jobs in North Carolina. When those plant closings are final, VF expects that just 15 percent of the products it sells in the United States will be made domestically, down from 70 percent in 1996.

"Nobody likes to shut down a U.S. plant," Knoebel said. "If there is a better alternative, we'd like to keep it here."

VF's biggest customer, Wal-Mart, maintains constant pressure on VF to deliver jeans and shirts at the lowest prices.

Wal-Mart may be the United States' biggest winner in the realm of global free trade.

Wal-Mart is the world's largest retailer and the nation's largest employer. If founder Sam Walton were still alive, he'd be the richest man in the world. Forbes magazine ranks his widow and each of his four children among the world's 10 wealthiest people.

VF developed its retail-floor-management capability in tandem with Wal-Mart in the 1980s. In effect, VF sets up and manages Wal-Mart apparel departments.

"Pressure on prices, that's their credo," Knoebel said. "That's what they offer consumers, and it keeps us sharp. We don't always like it, but ... "

In February, Wal-Mart moved its global purchasing center to Shenzen, a boomtown in southern China near Hong Kong. Wal-Mart buys about $10 billion worth of goods from China a year.

One huge winner from free trade agreements is China, which was admitted to the World Trade Organization in 2001. Multinational corporations have flocked to invest in or buy goods from China, drawn by its massive pool of inexpensive labor.

The World Bank estimates that China will control 47 percent of the world's clothing exports in 2005, up from from 18 percent in 1995.

Among the U.S. industries scrambling to adapt to the Chinese challenge is furniture manufacturing. North Carolina is the nation's largest furniture producer, and the industry employs about 65,000 workers in the state (down more than 10,000 from two years ago).

Over the past five years, China's furniture imports to the United States have grown by 36 percent each year, and China is now the biggest exporter of furniture to the United States.

The corporate owner of much of North Carolina's furniture industry, Furniture Brands International, has placed its bet firmly on China. Furniture Brands sells its wares under the names Broyhill, Thomasville, Drexel Heritage, Lane and Henredon.

Last year, Furniture Brands closed 12 U.S. plants and cut 20 percent of its U.S. work force, including more than 1,300 workers at plants in Drexel, Black Mountain, Morganton and West Jefferson. Meanwhile, the company has contracted with five furniture companies in China and Taiwan to supply parts and finished furniture.

Part of China's appeal is that its factories are modern and efficient, Furniture Brands' chief executive officer, Mickey Holliman, told the financial weekly Barron's last year.

But, he added, "Lower labor costs are the main reason for the attractiveness of imports. Over there, laborers make 30 to 40 cents an hour, live in dormitories and work seven days a week."

And Chinese companies don't bear other costs that American companies do: air- and water-pollution rules, worker-safety standards, Social Security taxes and the like, furniture industry analyst Jerry Epperson said.

Epperson also said China has different economic priorities. In the United States, a company's goal is profit. Layoffs are part of doing business.

In China, one of the government's main goals is to support job creation to head off social unrest: Unemployment is expected to top 15 percent in the coming years, according to the Chinese Academy of Social Services.

"They need industry, they want to employ people," Epperson said.

Tom Culbreth, a furniture industry expert at N.C. State University, said that despite the threat from foreign competition, North Carolina's furniture industry has some advantages that he thinks will help it survive.

"We've got proximity to raw materials, we've got proximity to consumer market, and imports are now as cheap as they are ever going to be," Culbreth said. "The furniture industry will diminish, it will not disappear."

Workers will lose jobs, he said, but companies will remain profitable.

"What is clear is that they continue to operate profitably, but they shift operations overseas," he said. "This is not a phenomenon restricted to furniture. All manufacturers are shifting product overseas."

China's challenge to U.S. workers is not limited, however, to traditional manufacturing sectors such as textiles, apparel and furniture.

General Electric, IBM, Motorola and Microsoft have all opened research centers in China recently. Intel is assembling its Pentium 4 chips there, and Dell Computer is building computers. DuPont, Emerson Electric and dozens of other Fortune 500 companies have moved production to China.

The steady move of manufacturing operations offshore troubles many experts in the United States. Discussions with engineers or analysts or academics about the effects of free trade invariably lead to the question of whether the United States is hollowing out its industrial economy.

"We are, rightly or wrongly, a country of haves and have-nots," said Norwood, the textile analyst. "We are creating service-industry jobs. I don't know what will happen to this country if we rely on other countries for our manufactured products."

Russ King, an industrial engineering professor at N.C. State, also finds the trends worrisome. "How much of the manufacturing base can we afford to give away?" he asked. "The country as a whole cannot be a service economy. We need to make things."

Staff writer Joseph Neff can be reached at 829-4516 or jneff@newsobserver.com.

News researcher Brooke Cain contributed to this report.