|
This course is a seminar on the relationships between computer network
technology and political institutions and behavior. The course will seek
to:
- refine concepts and causal models of politics and advance students'
familiarity with the vocabulary and methods of political science;
- focus on the effects of emerging computer and communication technologies
on politics, especially in the United States;
- envision a workable, realistic future of American politics in the
presence of computer technology, and propose normative directions for
the development of democratic technologies;
- expose students to the practical integration of network design tools
and political institutions.
- Learn to apply political science theories, concepts and methods in
a specific research context;
- Develop a broad understanding of network technology and the technical
infrastructure of American (and, to a lesser extent, international)
politics;
- Acquire and improve academic writing and web design skills (Macromedia
Dreamweaver and Fireworks).
The instructor is committed to helping students enjoy the class, the materials,
and the learning process. To that end, students must provide
ongoing feedback on the class to the instructor and each other. A successful
experience will depend greatly on students taking the initiative to propose
new topics, contribute information and design rules and norms for class
collaboration. Students are expected to be respectful of each other in
the classroom and online as we model the real-and-ideal civil society
we are studying.
The texts are all available in the Duke
Textbook store; they are also in the Duke
Libraries and online. Links are provided to the price list for each
book at isbn.nu and to books' pages at Amazon.com:
| Book Citation |
Library |
isbn.nu |
Amazon |
| Davis, Richard. The Web of Politics: The Internet's
Impact on the American Political System. New York: Oxford
University Press, 1999. Library |
 |
 |
 |
| Grossman, Lawrence K. The Electronic Republic:
Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age. New York: Viking,
1995 (hardback), 1996 (paperback). |
 |
 |
 |
| Kamarck, Elaine Ciulla and Joseph S. Nye, Jr. Democracy.com?
Governance in a Networked World. Hollis NH: Hollis Publishing
Company, 1999. |
|
 |
 |
Students are advised that they may wish to budget an additional
$15-30 to buy newly published books that are candidates for assigned review
papers.
Frequent use of the CourseInfo website is absolutely necessary. The site
is located at:
https://courses.duke.edu/courses/POLSCI129S.01-F2001/
All class business will be conducted through the CourseInfo site. Students
must check the site on a regular basis (preferably daily). If you have
not used CourseInfo before, you should meet with the instructor immediately
for a crash tutorial.
The calendar is posted and is included here
by reference. The calendar includes (or will include) links to all required
and supplemental reading materials. It may be revised at any time along
with notice to all; students may participate in making changes.
The instructor will attempt to schedule frequent evening help sessions
in the Interactive Computer
Classroom in SocSci 229.
Grading will be as follows (subject to some changes given class input
during the first two weeks), for a total possible of 1,000 points; see
below for detailed descriptions of assignments:
| Percent |
Grading Category |
|
Instructor |
Peer Review |
Total Points |
| 10% |
Class participation,
including frequent short discussion-starters on required and optional
readings. |
|
100 |
0 |
100 |
| 13% |
Personal course web page
cataloging assignments and documenting personal work on course topics |
|
100 |
30 |
130 |
| 12% |
Regular contributions to
the online CourseInfo discussion group. (12 weeks @ 10 points
each) |
|
120 |
0 |
120 |
| 20% |
Two solo review and analysis
papers reviewing books or major articles relevant to your class
project group and committee assignments (10% each; two student reviewers
for each paper award up to five points each) |
|
180 |
20
|
200 |
| 45% |
Class project (15%
each for individual-, group-, and class-level contributions); see
final project guidelines below. individual- and group-level project
grading should be entirely by peer review under rules established
by the class polity) |
|
150 |
300 |
450 |
| ? |
Small extra credit
opportunities TBA (no more than 30 points or 3% possible) |
|
? |
? |
? |
| 100% |
TOTAL POINTS |
|
650 |
350 |
1,000 |
The proposed grading scale is as follows; don't let the numbers intimidate
you, there will surely be plenty of A's and a couple A+'s:
| Grade |
Minimum % |
|
Grade |
Minimum % |
| A+ |
98% |
|
C+ |
75% |
| A |
95% |
|
C |
71% |
| A- |
91% |
|
C- |
67% |
| B+ |
87% |
|
D+ |
63% |
| B |
83% |
|
D |
59% |
| B- |
79% |
|
D- |
55% |
| |
|
|
F |
<55% |
Readings
on the course calendar marked with an asterisk
(*) are required; you will need to read this material with attention to
participate in the class. Students will be asked to give brief summaries
and simple analysis of the readings at each class meeting; no one is expected
to be completely informed at all times, but the semester's pattern should
be positive for each student to receive a high score.
Readings and sites marked with a hyphen (-) are supplemental; some will
already be familiar and can be skimmed for a refresher. Unless you already
have a copy, please print and at least skim each supplemental reading
before class and bring it to class; the instructor will refer to these
materials in class and you can use the printed copies to take notes.
You never thought
you'd be required to surf the web, but you'll have to do so for
this seminar. As the class begins, you should visit slashdot.org
at least three times a week and look for stories and discussions that
interest you, then use those to find additional links you want to follow.
Slashdot is a leading "weblog" site with a moderation system
that may presage the future of direct democracy (or "meritocracy").
At the outset, surfing Slashdot as a class will provide a basis for some
common ground in class, and will expose you to technical language and
strange ideas; as the course progresses, we may identify alternative sites
we may want to monitor as a group.
Each student should contribute a minimum of three "posts"
or messages to the Reviews
and Replies forum. Each week's posts are worth 10 points and must
be completed by Saturday at 5:00pm to receive credit. The posts should
be as follows:
- One major post (worth up to 6 points) reviewing and critiquing 1)
a web site with political implications or 2) a course reading or 3)
a major news story or developing issue from Slashdot
or another online source. Each of these 3 categories should receive
a separate "subthread" for the week. Major posts should be
3-5 paragraphs in length, written in clear, correct academic style and
thoroughly documented with links to sources and citations.
- Two minor posts (worth up to 2 points each) responding thoughtfully
and informatively to another class member's post; also written in academic
style.
All posts MUST be correctly organized in a single weekly thread to
receive credit for that week. If a thread for the new week does not
yet exist, you must create one and put your major post in it.
To ensure that you receive proper credit for your work, you should
also maintain a list of links to your posts on your personal course
web page. We will discuss how to do this in class.
This assignment is intended to pursue several goals: 1) to work on writing
skills without too many longer assignments; 2) to practice the new technology
of online discussions in a literate and civil fashion; 3) to encourage
reading and discussion of course materials. In this light, forum posts
should be well-written, polite and thoughtful. Humor and banter are welcome,
but be careful to keep the Reviews and Replies Forum focused on class
topics. Students must decide how to administer this forum and how to meet
the weekly quota of messages.
Two five- to eight-page
solo-written papers are required. Due dates are September 28 and
October 24. Each paper will be followed one week later by a peer
review of two other students' papers. The instructor will soon provide
a list of suggested readings for review, but students may propose others.
The reviews should reflect the student's role in the class project to
some extent.
The class project has
three major goals:
- Class Polity: students must discuss, constitute, organize and
execute a political organization or government that encompasses rules
and procedures for collaborative work, peer review and online etiquette.
The Class
Polity forum is the central space for this activity. The Zope server
on the instructor's personal machine and an Active Server Pages site
on the Political Science Department server may provide opportunities
for additional inventiveness. The polity's constitution should be thoroughly
documented and presented to the public as part of the project; the instructor's
minimal initial proposal is posted here.
- Public Research Site: The class will design and assemble a
web site (actually a collection of sites) presenting our findings on
the topics selected by the Class Polity. The Class Polity will be responsible
for assigning roles in the project development and for organizing the
project into a useful format. Each of three research groups will produce
at least one written report of 10-20 pages. On request, the instructor
will provide technical and logistical support, advice, and occasional
writings.
- Student Resumes: The class project, both as a polity and a
public site, offers an opportunity for students to display their skills
to prospective employers. Every item on every page of the site should
properly credited, and
Some possible topic areas for the class project; the final topics
should be more specific:
- Voting Online: How would online voting change American politics?
If we embrace online voting, should we vote for the same things we do
now, or more? What decision rules should we use? If Americans could
vote directly on more national issues, would their political efficacy
increase or decrease? Would they be more or less satisfied with government?
- Democracy-in-a-Box: What does political science suggest are
the requirements for a complete democratic government or organization
to be run in cyberspace? What "constitutional" functions would
it have to perform? What hardware and software arrangements would be
necessary, and how dependent would the success this "product"
necessarily be on the characteristics of the people using it? This topic
would be relatively heavy on technical research, and could take the
form of a "request for proposal" to Internet technology organizations
for providing the product.
- The Future of Geography and Politics: This project would evaluate
the importance (or lack thereof) of town, county, state, and even national
territorial boundaries in the technological future. How does CMC (computer-mediated
communication) change the role of place. Is social capital a necessarily
physical phenomenon, or can it exist in "pure cyberspace"?
- A Media of One: How much does Internet publishing empower the
individual? Does CMC really flatten distinctions between "elites"
and "masses", or does it just create new elites with new and
frightening powers? What is the future of individual civil liberties
and political participation in such a world?
Here is an idea of how you can manage this workload for a typical day:
- Come to class: 70 minutes, including travel time
- Read Slashdot.org and research
project work on or off-line: 60 minutes maximum
- Print, if necessary, then read assigned texts for the next class period:
120 minutes maximum
- Read forums, then post a message or two on the online forum : 50 minutes
maximum.
This adds up to 300 minutes or five hours three times a week, maximum,
including class time, for a maximum of fifteen hours weekly; typical
requirements should be much closer to ten hours, leaving time for recreation
and/or employment even with a full course load. Falling behind will obviously
begin to hurt in a hurry, however. If you find that you regularly need
more time to fulfill the course requirements, please talk with the instructor
immediately.
This class will focus on writing well; while your grades will not depend
heavily on your initial writing ability, you must demonstrate effort and
improvement in response to critique as the course proceeds. The instructor
will provide detailed editorial comments on each paper. Grammatical errors,
stylistic problems and logical faults addressed in these comments should
not recur if you want to receive a good grade for the course. You are
encouraged to take advantage of the services the campus Writing Studio
offers. It is best to schedule an appointment early in the writing process.
To do so, use the on-line appointment
calendar.
Official excuses can be obtained from the dean's office of your school.
They are available only for missed written assignments and examinations,
and only due to illness, representing the university (e.g. athletic competition),
or for a death in the family. A list of deans is available at http://www.provost.duke.edu
under the "Deans and Directors" link; for most, your dean is
in the School of Arts and Sciences.
If at any time you feel your state of mind is interfering with your class
performance, please speak with the instructor. If you would prefer to
speak with someone else, contact Duke
Counseling and Psychological Services (CAPS) at 660-1000 or in 214
Page (next to the Duke Chapel).
Students with disabilities that may require extended exam times or other
accommodations should contact the Office
of Services for Students with Disabilities at (919) 684-5917 or e-mail
director Emma Swain at eswain@duke.edu.
The instructor cannot alter the course requirements for any disability
without certification from this office.
|