Research Project and Numerical Methods
High-Speed Machining
Project
Extended Finite Element Method
Level Set Method
Mortar Finite Element Method
Element Free Galerkin Method
Infinite Finite Element Method
Research Project
Thermomechanical Investigations of High Speed Machining of Aluminum
The high-speed machining process is a dynamic one in which material is removed from bulk stock through the motion of a tool moving at very high speeds over the surface. The process converts mechanical energy into thermal energy due to both the bulk pastic response of the workpiece and the frictional heating at the tool-chip surface. This project is a collaboration between Duke University, the University of Notre Dame, and Alcoa. Researchers at Notre Dame (directed by Professor Jim Mason) are conducting experimental studies of the temperature distribution in the workpiece. Duke is responsible for the simulation efforts. We are investigating both transient and steady-state cutting conditions with numerical methods. The steady-state formulation employs the X-FEM to update the chip geometry without remeshing, and employs mortar elements to impose contact constraints. The transient problem is being studied with the commercial software D-FORM. This project is sponsored by the National Science Foundation. |
![]() |
| High speed Machining Movie(Click Here) |
Contour plot of the temperature distribution (in degrees Celsius) in an aluminum workpiece being cut at a speed of 50m/s. |
Current Research Numerical Techniques
Extended Finite Element Method(XFEM)
|
The Extended Finite Element Method is a new technique for the finite element modelling of internal features such as material interfaces, sliding interfaces, and cracks. This method allows for the modelling of arbitrary moving geometric features independently of the finite element mesh with evolving enrichment functions. Especially, this method has an advantage to model crack growth without remeshing. The main idea is to extend a classical approximation by augmenting the set of nodal shape functions with products of a subset of these same functions and local enrichment functions. The following figures show the difference of the standard finite element mesh and the extended finite element mesh and the results for a crack growth. |
![]() |
Contour plot of the stress distribution of FEM mesh(above) and XFEM mesh(below) |
XFEM (related papers)
Level Set Method
|
The level set method is to track moving interfaces in a wide variety of prolbems. It relies of the relation between propagation interfaces and propagating shocks. The central idea is to follow the evolution of a function whose zero level set always corresponds to the position of the propagating interface. The motion for this evolving function is determined from a partial differential equation in one higher dimension which permits cusps, sharp corners, and changes in topology in the zero level set describing the interface. The level set approach has been used to compute and analyze a broad array of physical and mathematical phenomena, including singularities in mean curvature flow, crystal growth and dendrite solidification, combustion, shape recognition, minimal surface generation, two fluid problems, phase transition, modelling of material interfaces, and triple junction problems. I am using this technique to track a moving chip geometry during the machining process. The following figure is the signed distance function used to initialize the level set partial differential equation. |
Mortar Element Method
|
The mortar element method is to deal with non-conforming
discretizations across contacting boundaries. In those contact problems
where conforming discretizations are
to be expected, parametrization of the contact surfaces is straightforward.
For example, when one deformable body is subject to unilateral contact
constraints imposed by a rigid
obstacle, the contact surface can inherit element discretizations
along the contacting element edges without any ambiguity or subsequent
difficulty in numerical approximation.
Likewise, in small deformation contact problems where the meshes
of the contacting surfaces are conforming, the contact quantities can
be taken to vary according to the shared
element parametrizations along the surface. However, in large deformation
two-body problems, the distortion of elements comprising the surface and
their potenrially large
relative motion make it impractical to maintain conforming discretization
across the contact surface. |
Element Free Galerkin Method
Infinite Element Method